假設我有變數：
A = 3
B = 2
C = 1
如何將它們轉換為以下形式的對角矩陣：
np.diag([1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0])
Out[0]:
array([[1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]])
np.diag([0,0,0,1,1,0])
Out[1]:
array([[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]])
np.diag([0,0,0,0,0,1])
Out[2]:
array([[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]])
我希望這是可擴展的，因此例如有 4 個變數a = 500, b = 20, c = 300, d = 200，矩陣的大小將為500 20 300 200 = 1020. 最簡單的方法是什么？
uj5u.com熱心網友回復：
的強制性解決方案，比2 核 colab 實體上的陣列的公認答案np.einsum慢約2.25 倍。[500,20,200,300]
import numpy as np
A = 3
B = 2
C = 1
r = [A,B,C]
m = np.arange(len(r))
np.einsum('ij,kj->ijk', m.repeat(r) == m[:,None], np.eye(np.sum(r), dtype='int'))
輸出
array([[[1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]],
[[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]],
[[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]]])
uj5u.com熱心網友回復：
這是一種方法。結果陣列mats包含您要查找的矩陣。
A = 3
B = 2
C = 1
n_list = [A,B,C]
ab_list = np.cumsum([0] n_list)
ran = np.arange(ab_list[-1])
mats = [np.diag(((a <= ran) & (ran < b)).astype('int'))
for a,b in zip(ab_list[:-1],ab_list[1:])]
for mat in mats:
print(mat,'\n')
結果：
[[1 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 1 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 1 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]]
[[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 1 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 1 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]]
[[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 1]]
編輯：這是一個更快的解決方案，產生相同的結果
n_list = [A,B,C]
ab_list = np.cumsum([0] n_list)
total = ab_list[-1]
ran = np.arange(total)
mats = np.zeros((len(n_list),total,total))
for k,p in enumerate(zip(ab_list[:-1],ab_list[1:])):
idx = np.arange(p[0],p[1])
mats[k,idx,idx] = 1
for mat in mats:
print(mat,'\n')
這似乎比目前接受的解決方案產生了約 10% 的加速
另一個性能大致相當的：
n_list = [A,B,C]
m = len(n_list)
ab_list = np.cumsum([0] n_list)
total = ab_list[-1]
ran = np.arange(total)
mats = np.zeros((m,total,total))
idx = [k for a,b in zip(ab_list[:-1],ab_list[1:]) for k in range(a,b)]
mats[[k for k,n in enumerate(n_list) for _ in range(n)],
idx,idx] = 1
for mat in mats:
print(mat,'\n')
uj5u.com熱心網友回復：
您可以通過僅分配一次陣列，然后通過指定索引一次設定所有值來獲得更好的性能。幸運的是，這些指數很容易獲得。
import numpy as np
a = [3, 2, 1] # Put your values in a list
s = np.sum(a)
m = np.zeros((len(a), s, s), dtype=int) # Initialize array once
indices = (np.repeat(range(len(a)), a), *np.diag_indices(s, 2)) # Get indices
m[indices] = 1 # Set the diagonals at once
return m
輸出：
[[[1 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 1 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 1 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]]
[[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 1 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 1 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]]
[[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 1]]]
與@Ben Grossmann 的回答相比，A=3000, B=2000, C=1000重復100：
def A():
'''My solution'''
a = [3000, 2000, 1000] # Put your values in a list
s = np.sum(a)
m = np.zeros((len(a), s, s), dtype=int) # Initialize array once
indices = (np.repeat(range(len(a)), a), *np.diag_indices(s, 2)) # Get indices
m[indices] = 1 # Set the diagonals at once
return m
def B():
'''Bens solution'''
A = 3000
B = 2000
C = 1000
n_list = [A,B,C]
ab_list = np.cumsum([0] n_list)
ran = np.arange(ab_list[-1])
return [np.diag(((a <= ran) & (ran < b)).astype('int')) for a,b in zip(ab_list[:-1], ab_list[1:])]
print(f'Timings:')
timeA = timeit.timeit(A, number=100)
timeB = timeit.timeit(B, number=100)
ratio = timeA / timeB
print(f'This solution: {timeA} seconds')
print(f'Current accepted answer: {timeB} seconds')
if ratio < 1:
print(f'This solution is {1 / ratio} times faster than Bens solution')
else:
print(f'Bens solution is {ratio} times faster than this solution')
輸出：
Timings:
This solution: 1.6834218999993027 seconds
Current accepted answer: 5.096610300000066 seconds
This solution is 3.027529997086397 times faster than Bens solution
編輯：將“索引”演算法更改為使用np.repeat而不是np.concatenate.
uj5u.com熱心網友回復：
一種可能的方法（不要認為它是最佳的，但它有效）：
import numpy as np
a = 3
b = 2
c = 1
values = [a,b,c] #create a list with values
n = sum(values) #calc total length of diagnal
#create an array with cumulative sums but starting from 0 to use as index
idx_vals = np.zeros(len(values) 1,dtype=int)
np.cumsum(values,out=idx_vals[1:]);
#create every diagonal using values, then create diagonal matrices and
#save them in `matrices` list
matrices = []
for idx,v in enumerate(values):
diag = np.zeros(n)
diag[idx_vals[idx]:idx_vals[idx] v] = np.ones(v)
print(diag)
matrices.append(np.diag(diag))
uj5u.com熱心網友回復：
還有一種可能：
import numpy as np
# your constants here
constants = [3, 2, 1] # [A, B, C]
size = sum(constants)
cumsum = np.cumsum([0] constants)
for i in range(len(cumsum) - 1):
inputVector = np.zeros(size, dtype=int)
inputVector[cumsum[i]:cumsum[i 1]] = 1
matrix = np.diag(inputVector)
print(matrix, '\n')
輸出：
[[1 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 1 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 1 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]]
[[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 1 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 1 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]]
[[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 1]]
轉載請註明出處，本文鏈接：https://www.uj5u.com/qiye/424167.html
上一篇：從for回圈追加時的資料型別問題