I am the guy who made the Primer Fields video. Sorry for the length of this post, but is has to be long in order to address the issues I am seeing in some of the comments here. I just have time to make this post here and then back to work on the next videos and a paper for submission that covers my research. I hope to have PF2 up by Feb. 1. I will not be able to respond to any questions or comments here. I may read them and then address them in my upcoming videos for all to see and learn from.
我就是制作了<初子場域>視頻的那個人，抱歉，接下來的帖子可能有點長，但為了闡述清楚問題我必須這么做，我現在正好有時間來發這個帖，然后緊接著制作初子場域視頻的第二部和發表一篇關于我的研究的論文，我希望能到 2 月 1 號前發表初子場域視頻的第二部，我將不會在這里回應任何關于這個理論的疑問和評論，我可能會閱讀它們并在接下來的視頻中回應這些疑問和評論，以便所有人都能看見并學習，
Regarding intrinsic magnetic fields. All matter has intrinsic magnetic fields to it. Research this. All I did was change the shape of the source of the intrinsic magnetic fields. My main focus of my work has NOT been astrophysics, but physics at the atomic and sub-atomic level. The particles of matter at the LHC are driven around the LHC by MAGNETIC FIELDS. They are able to do this because of the intrinsic magnetic fields in all matter. Think this through carefully. It is based on repeatably proven science fact and experiments. Magnetic fields are intrinsic to all matter structures and that is undeniable fact. Trying to prove where they come from would be like asking me to prove water is wet. Think this through.
提到物質的固有磁場，所有物質都有固有磁場，研究它！我所做的只是改變了這個固有磁場的形狀，我作業的主要關注點不是天文物理，而是原子物理或亞原子物理級別的研究，在 LHC(大型強子對撞機)中運行并碰撞的物質粒子是由磁場驅動的，他們能這樣做，完全是由于所有物質都有固有磁場，仔細思考這點！這是被可重復的實驗事實證明了的，所有物質都有固有磁場，這是無可爭議的事實，試圖去驗證這些磁場究竟來自哪里，就好像在驗證水為什么會是濕的一樣，仔細思考這點！
They are there and I don't have to prove that as it is already accepted as fact. If you think that they can be electrically generated just on what we find in space, then I challenge you to prove it and not just say it.This is what true scientists do, they prove their statements. In six years of experiments I find zero evidence that these intrinsic magnetic fields are driven or generated by external electrical currents. I have run many many experiments without my magnetic emitters and I have seen zero evidence of this happening. If you go back and look at Birkleland's experiments you will notice that he had to put a source of a magnetic field into his sphere to find his Birkeland currents. No magnetic field no Birkeland currents. So the magnetic fields have to be there before any electricity is provided. Therefore the electricity did not form the magnetic fields and without magnetic fields you get no Birkeland currents.
它們(固有磁場)就在那里并且我不必去驗證這個已經被當作事實來接受了的事情，如果你認為它們(物質的固有磁場)可以由電來生成，那么我向你挑戰:你去證明它，而不是只動動嘴，這是一個真正的科學家做的事情，他們會證明自己的宣告，經過六年多的實驗，我沒有發現任何證據來證明：這些固有磁場是由外部電流產生的，我做了非常非常多的實驗，如果沒有磁場發射器，那么也就沒有任何現象會產生，如果你去看看伯克蘭(Kristian Olaf Birkeland)的實驗(terrella experiment)，你會發現他不得不在他的圓球周圍放一個磁場，只有這樣做才能產生伯克蘭電流(Birkeland currents)，沒有磁場，也就沒有伯克蘭電流，所以，磁場必須在電流提供之前存在，因此，電不能產生磁并且沒有磁場也就沒有伯克蘭電流，
The EUT is mostly correct and absolutely more correct than current mainstream AP. But there is no proof as to the source of the electricity.I am very aware of magneto hydrodynamics and in fact my theories use it, but you still have to prove that MHD is the real source and I see no evidence for that when it comes to externally powered stars etc. In fact if you carefully observe my experiments you will see the variance between my electrically driven plasma formation and the formations in space. They are NOT the same. They are similar in that the plasma reveals the shape of the fields. The steel ball experiments I show in the videos also do this WITHOUT electricity. I do this to show that electricity is NOT the driver of the formations we see in space, but in fact is produced by the formations we see in space. I have to be careful in how I present this evidence because I have working technology based on these theories and I have patents in the works. But in PF2 I will present the mechanism by which electricity is produced by the Sun.I DO NOT AGREE with the current mainstream view of the Sun as being internally fusion powered and I find that all evidence and hard data point directly away from this concept. So I do understand the EUT frustrations with the blindness in the mainstream. But I am not the mainstream. So do not try and say things against what I am saying until you can prove it. That is what I did. I kept my mouth closed until I had hard repeatable data.
EUT(Electric Universe Theory,電宇宙理論)絕大部分是正確的并且比目前主流的 AP(Atomic Physics,原子物理)理論更正確，但是沒有證據表明電的來源，我非常關心磁流體力學，事實上我的理論中使用了它，但是你仍然需要證明MHD(Magnetohydrodynamics，磁流體)是真正的來源，在觀察外部驅動的恒星時，我沒有看到任何證據表明這點，事實上，如果你仔細觀察我的實驗，你會看到我的外加電極驅動的等離子形態和太空中的形態是有區別的，它們絕不相同！它們只是在等離子顯示了磁場外形方面是相似的，我做的那個鋼球實驗，同樣是噴射了物質，但卻不必外加電極，我做這個實驗是為了說明：電并沒有驅動并運作我們在太空中看到的形態，事實上電是被這種形態給制造出來的，我不得不謹慎的在實驗中演示這個證據，因為我有相關的專利科技是基于這個理論的，但是在<初子場域 2>中，我將會演示這種機制，太陽就是通過這種機制來產生電流的，我絕不贊同當前主流界認為的，太陽是被內部的核聚變驅動并運行的理論，并且有明顯的觀測資料違背這一理論，所以，我非常能理解 EUT 作業者不被主流界接受時的沮喪心情，但我不是主流界的，所以，在你不能證明自己觀點是否正確時，請不要試圖說一些針對我理論的話，除非你能實驗驗證自己的觀點，這就是我的作業方式，在沒有明顯可重復資料支持時，我通常會緊閉我的嘴，
But I do find that the Sun is fusion powered from the outside. Find the highest temperature and you have the place where fusion is greatest.Simple logic. Then as to the EUT, If the Sun were externally electrically powered we would not find these incredible temperature variances between the surface of the Sun and the corona-sphere. It would all be pretty much the same temperature. This is simple logic, backed by experiments. So in an externally powered Sun you have to explain the mechanism for the Solar interior being 5000K and the hottest areas in the corona-sphere being over 2 million K. IN fact you have to provide a mechanism for the interior of the Sun to be cooled as it is surrounded by the much hotter corona-sphere. That mechanism I cannot prove, but I do have a couple of ideas that I will expound on in my videos. Too much to discuss here.
但是我確實發現了太陽是在外部聚變的事實，找到了溫度最高的地方，你就找到了聚變發生的確切位置，很簡單的邏輯，接著說 EUT，如果太陽是被外部電極驅動的話，我們將不會發現太陽光球區表層和日冕區之間非常巨大的溫差，它們之間的溫度將不會差太多，這是一個由我做實驗，進而得出的簡單邏輯，所以，如果你聲稱太陽是被外部電極驅動的話，你必須解釋為什么光球區表層溫度只有5000 開爾文，而日冕區卻高達 200 萬開爾文，事實上，你必須提供一個太陽外熱內冷的合理機制，這個機制我不能證明，但我確實有一些想法，我將會在接下來的視頻中闡述我的這個觀點，內容太多，以至在這里不能講的太多，
My thinking that the Sun cannot be externally powered is also backed by experimental proof of little or no temperature variance in my experiments, which are indeed externally electrically driven. Therefore one must conclude that NASA et all is incorrect and the current EUT theory is incorrect based on repeatable experiments. Six years of experiments in fact.
我認為太陽不是被外部電極驅動的，這個觀點同樣是被實驗資料支持的，那就是：實驗中只有很小或者基本沒有溫度差異，因此，必須要得出一個結論，那就是：NASA 的電極理論全部是錯的并且當前的 EUT 理論也是錯誤的，他們的錯誤都是基于可重復的實驗證明了的，事實上，我做了六年的實驗，
But again I do agree with the concepts of the EUT more than I agree with BH, DM, and DE, which I find no reason to exist and in fact I find zero proof that any of them exist.
但是相比 BH(黑洞),DM(暗物質),DE(暗能量)等理論，我更加贊同 EUT 理論，因為，我發現它們(BH,DM,DE)沒理由存在，事實上我沒有發現任何證據表明它們存在，
Furthermore. I am a plasma physicist as you can see. I know very well what a Z-pinch is. Please do not make comments that I don't realize I made a Z-pinch. To those who actually worked with Z-pinches a comment like that makes the whole EUT look really bad. What I made is not a Z-pinch at all. NOT AT ALL. Trying to say it does makes you look really really bad. Sorry, but it does. It makes those who really know how a Z-pinch really works pay no attention to anything else you say.I am sorry, but that is how these guys think.
此外，我是一個等離子物理學家，正如你看到的那樣，我非常清楚什么是 Z-pinch，請不要發表評論說我沒意識到我制作了一個 Z-pinch，對于那些真正作業在Z-pinch 領域的人來說，這樣的評論會讓整個 EUT 界感到尷尬，我做的這個，絕對不是 Z-pinch！根本不是！試圖說這樣的話會讓你感到非常非常尷尬，對不起，但確實是這樣，那些真正懂得 Z-pinch 到底如何作業的人，根本會無視你的評論，對不起，但這些人確實是這么想的，
It would be like me telling you the moon is really made of cheese and then wondering why you won't listen to me. So really research what you believe, for your own sake.
這就好像：我告訴你月球的確是奶酪做的并且我非常疑惑為什么你不這么想，所以，請仔細研究，你認為是對的東西，這也是對你自己負責，
I hope to work with the EU folks in the future and I have been in communication with them. But for now I must stand alone. There are currently some EU statements that are not scientifically backed by proven facts and indeed go against scientific fact. Z-pinchs are one of those statements, as is the externally powered Sun and stars.
我希望在今后和 EU(Electric Universe)界的人一起作業，事實上我已經和他們中的一些人聯系上了，但是現在，我必須獨自站隊，當前 EU 界的某些觀點，并沒有可靠的事實資料支撐，事實上違反了科學事實，Z-pinch 就是這樣的觀點，還有就是恒星和太陽是被外部電極驅動的觀點，
It is an electric universe and the electricity is generated around the stars. I can prove it. How do you generate electricity here on Earth. You move magnetic fields. This is what these intrinsic bowl shaped magnetic fields do, they cause magnetic fields to move very violently past each other, i.e. MHD, and guess what happens? You get electricity and the hottest points around the Sun are exactly where the greatest magnetic turbulence would take place. This in turn leads to fusion and the fusion provides the extra kick to keep it all going and generating electricity. So these theories account for where the electricity in the universe comes from and it all matches ALL the hard data. I really believe that endless clean power is near. Don't have it all worked out yet, but I do have tech that is based on these theories that is in over twelve countries right now. It works really well and it would not work if my theories were not correct. That technology has been the main focus of my research for the last six years. The AP stuff is just cool because it provides validation of my theories.
這是一個充滿電的宇宙并且電被產生出來并圍繞著恒星，我能證明它！你是怎么在地球上產生電的呢，移動磁場，這就是這些固有磁場做的事情，它們導致磁場之間猛烈的相互運動，例如：MHD(Magnetohydrodynamics，磁流體)，猜猜會發生什么？你得到了電流并且圍繞太陽周圍最熱的地方正是磁場擾動最厲害的區域，這依次又導致了聚變發生，并且聚變提供了額外的震動來讓這一切繼續發生并且產生電流，所以，這個理論證明了宇宙中的電從哪里來，并且符合所有的觀測資料，我真的相信，無盡的清潔能源正在臨近，我們還沒有完全做出來，但是我有基于這一理論的科技，可以在 12 個國家立即實作，它作業的非常好，如果我的理論是錯的話，它將不會作業，在過去的六年里，我研究的主要內容就是這項科技，原子物理界的人士也非常酷，因為它們提供了對我理論的驗證實驗，
Please carefully considered what you type here. I have. I have patiently waited six years to go public with what I have. That is six years of 80 hours per week. Everything I say is backed by experiments and I have not had one mainstream physics or AP attack on any of my theories that I am aware of. All I have heard is their silence. In fact I have physicists who totally back all I say.
請仔細考慮你寫下的每一個字，我耐心的等待了六年后才走到前臺來公布我的發現，這是六年的每周 80 小時的作業，我說的每一個字都是有實驗做支撐的并且沒有任何主流物理界的人士或原子物理界的人士批判我的理論，我所聽到的就是那里一片的寂靜，事實上，我有一些物理學家朋友，他們完全可以證明我此言不虛，
I know it is very frustrating to have the mainstream be so totally blind to some of the things the EUT calls for, but I am not mainstream and I am not your enemy. I am on your side more than I am on their side. I would suggest all of you take a step back and wait for the rest of my videos and my papers that I am working on as hard as I can. I only seek the truth and that is all. That is what every true scientist does.Just make sure you are seeking for the truth no matter where it leads, and not just trying to convince yourself that all you believe is true. That can be a very dangerous psychological trap that goes by the name of cognitive dissonance. This is the trap that I believe the mainstream has fallen into. I.E. our theories are correct and now we need patches to make our theories work.
我知道主流物理界對于 EUT 界的一些宣告完全無視，這非常令人沮喪，但我不是主流界的，所以我不是你們的敵人，我更傾向于站在你們這邊，而不是主流界那邊，我建議你們退后一步并等待我努力制作和發布的其余視頻和論文，我只是在尋找真理，僅僅是這樣，這正是每一個真正的科學家做的事情，僅僅確保你在尋找真理，而不管它將導致何種結果，而不是僅僅試圖說服自己你認為的就是對的，這會導致一個非常危險的心理陷阱，那就是認知不一致，這就是，我認為的主流物理界目前正陷入的一個陷阱，例如：我們的理論是正確的并且我們只需要對這理論做若干修補就可以了，
My approach is to try and shoot down my own theories and prove them incorrect. This approach has worked really well for me and any mistakes or problems are revealed when I do this. If I cannot prove something, I will not say it as a fact. If I say I believe that means I think that this is correct, but I cannot yet prove it, therefore it could be wrong. I think all of us should be like that, even NASA, even you, even me.
我的研究方法是試圖證明自己的理論是錯誤的，這個研究方法對我非常合適，并且任何錯誤或疑問會被呈現出來當我做它的時候，如果我不能證明一些事情，我不會把它當作一個事實來說，如果我說“我相信”，那意味著：我認為它是對的，但是我還沒有驗證它，因此它可能會錯，我認為我們大家應該會喜歡這樣的，甚至是 NASA，甚至是你，甚至是我，
I hope you all understand where I am coming from.
我希望，你們都知道我來自哪里了，
Cheers to all,
Dave
原帖地址：http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=9221&start=45
David is well
上圖來自 G+帳號: Rausch Zoltán
附上一些 wiki
鐵磁流體(Ferrofluid)的資訊:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrofluid
Kristian Olaf Birkeland(克里斯蒂安·伯克蘭): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristian_Birkeland
MHD 和 Hannes Alfvén(漢尼斯·阿爾文): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannes_Alfv%C3%A9n
轉載請註明出處，本文鏈接：https://www.uj5u.com/qukuanlian/2173.html
標籤：區塊鏈